Does knowing more about the background of the movie (from the post below) make the film more enjoyable? How? Should knowing about the process of the filming have any bearing on the film's overall value or worth?
I think that knowing more about the background of the movie would really depend on the movie and who’s watching it to decide if it made it better or not. I personally didn't enjoy this movie and knowing more about it probably wouldn't make it better in my eyes. However somebody who really enjoyed older movies would probably love to know more about the background of singing in the rain. Knowing the process of the film shouldn't really affect what you think of the film because if a film took a lot of money to produce and lots of hard work but it sucked, it’s still going to suck in the public’s eye. A good example of this was paranormal activity. It only cost about 10,000 dollars to produce and made tons of money and people loved it so in my opinion the process shouldn't play a role in whether or not it’s a good film or not.
But isn't part of what Paranormal Activity such an interesting movie is the fact that it was so low budget and starred people who weren't celebrities? That's part of its story.
ReplyDeleteOne easy thing you can do to make your English more standard is to capitalize the titles of films: Singing in the Rain, Paranormal Activity.